In the News

May

2013

9

WNYC: Sampson Corruption Scandal Hits Home for One Family

[Read Original]

WNYC’s All Things Considered

By Brigid Bergin

William Easterling and his wife used to own 165 Forbell Street, a two-family home in Brooklyn on the border of Cypress Hills and Ozone Park. The couple raised their four kids there. But they haven’t lived there in almost 20 years.

Easterling had been violently mugged on his way to work in 1992 and his wife said, “enough.” They moved. But his troubles didn’t end there. He had to file for bankruptcy and was forced to surrender the Brooklyn property.

What he didn’t know was that his old property was listed in the indictment against Senator John Sampson, who’s accused of keeping money that came from the foreclosure sale.

He also didn’t know that years ago he may have had a right to claim some of the $80,000 Sampson reported from the sale of 165 Forbell Street.

“Otherwise I would have the attorney looking into it with all the money I had to spend, plus with the money I lost in the home,” he said. “But I had no idea, no.”

Sampson is accused of embezzling $440,000 from the foreclosure sales of four properties. In each case, he was appointed by the courts to serve as the referee. In that role, he was overseeing the foreclosure auction and making sure that any surplus funds were returned to the Kings County clerk for disbursement. Sampson is accused of keeping that money for himself. He has pleaded not guilty to the charges.

Josh Zinner, co-director of NEDAP, a nonprofit that works on economic justice issues, says the extra money from foreclosure sales often represents the families’ leftover equity — and possibly their only source of wealth after they had lost their homes in foreclosure.

Easterling thinks someone should have told him there was money out there owed to him.

“I’m 70 years old, okay. I wasn’t born yesterday. I mean I look in the mirror and I don’t think I look that stupid,” he said. “If I should have been owed something, I feel like it should have been up to the court to inform me.”

A spokesman for the Office of Court Administration admitted there is no system in place to make sure referees actually deposit surplus funds from a foreclosure sale to families. And, technically, it wasn’t up to the court to notify Easterling.

Even if Easterling had known he should claim it, prosecutors are saying, the money wasn’t there to give. Sampson allegedly kept it.

Join the Movement!